Legal Opinion

Dryden v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canada

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided October 12, 1989No. IP 87-1189-CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY

DILLIN, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on the motion of defendant, Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (Sun Life), a mutual life insurance company, to dismiss the third amended complaint of the plaintiff, Gale E. Dryden (Dryden). For the following reasons, the defendant’s motion will be granted.

Background

Plaintiff Dryden initiated this action by filing a multicount complaint in this court on November 6,1987. The initial complaint alleged that Sun Life, along with its officers and directors, had violated Federal and Indiana securities law, breached its insurance contracts…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Total Petroleum, Inc. v. Gary J. Davis, D/B/A Gary J. Davis Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Factory Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re Metlife Demutualization LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  4. Hendrickson v. Peabody Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1997
  5. Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Factory Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API