Legal Opinion
Hendrickson v. Peabody Coal Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided October 7, 1997No. 4:95-cv-00224PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
McKINLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the motion by Defendants, Peabody Coal Company, Peabody Development Company, and Peabody Holding Company, Inc. (hereinafter collectively “Peabody”), for summary judgment [DN 64]. Fully briefed, this matter is now ripe for decision.
Facts
On April 16, 1966, Garry 0. Hendrick-son, Ona Hendrickson, William 0. Hen-drickson, Annizene Hendrickson, Olive Lewellyn, and Norman Lewellyn, as lessors, and Sentry Royalty Company, as lessee, entered into a coal mining lease (“1966 Lease Agreement”) of certain properties…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hydro Resources Corp. v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Hendrickson v. Alcoa Fuels, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Inmet Mining, LLC - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023