Legal Opinion

Fox v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1993No. 1911556PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs — John Fox, Pat Booher, Vickie Allen, and Jimmy Farris — sued Guy Hunt, Robin Swift, Robert Childree, Polly Conradi, Debra Hackett, and Jackie Calhoun, in their respective capacities as Governor, director of finance, state comptroller, and circuit court clerks.1 The complaint sought class certification for the plaintiffs as representatives of that class of plaintiffs in prior civil lawsuits that had paid the statutory $50 civil jury trial fee, pursuant to §§12-19-71(4) and -72(4), Ala. Code 1975. The complaint alleged that all statutory fees required to be paid for a jury trial…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. LeCroy v. HanlonTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Moog v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Davidson v. GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. County of Portage v. SteinpreisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Swann v. KiddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Simcala, Inc. v. American Coal Trade, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Crist v. ErvinSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  3. Barzellone v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. LaMarche v. McCarthySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. McGhee v. Housing Authority of Birmingham DistrictCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API