Legal Opinion

Swann v. Kidd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1885PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair. Motion to re-tax costs on appeal in this coxirt.

1Per curiam

The motion is made in this case to re-tax the costs, by striking out the sum of six dollars taxed for the benefit of the Supreme Court Library,under the act of February 23, 1883, and designated as the “Library Tax.”

The purpose of this act, as shown by the title, is “to provide a fund for the support of the Supreme Court *432Library, without appropriations from the treasury; and for this purpose it is enacted, that, in all suits decided on appeal in the Supreme Court, there shall be taxed, 'as costs, the sum of six dollars, in each case, to be collected as other costs, and to be paid to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. South & North Alabama Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Smith v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. State ex rel. Atchinson & Nebraska Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Joseph v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Mangan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. In Re LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Birmingham Electric Co. v. HarrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Marquardt v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API