Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Caldwell
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRAUGHN, Justice.
This mandamus action is directed at an order signed by Judge Neil Caldwell on May 27, 1993, which required Relator to produce all or portions of six documents which Relator claims are protected by the attorney-client and work-product privileges. With regard to some of the documents, Judge Caldwell directed Relator to simply redact any portions falling within the privilege, and leave those segments which contained relevant factual information. Relator’s claim that this order was a clear abuse of discretion, in that once a document is determined to contain privileged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Flores v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Keene Corp. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
- Marathon Oil Co. v. Moye, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- In Re ExxonMobil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Harlandale Independent School District v. Cornyn, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Morgan v. Deere Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.