Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Deere Credit, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 22, 1994No. C14-93-01017-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

This interlocutory appeal is from the certification of a mandatory class under Rule 42(b) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, sought by appellees, Deere Credit, Inc., and Deere & Company, Successor to John Deere Company (“Deere”). See Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(3) (Vernon Supp. 1994). Appellants, Shirley Y. Morgan and a class of persons similarly situated, contend in five points of error that the trial court abused its discretion. We affirm.

The underlying suit concerns the claims of Texas residents who entered financing agreements with Deere to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. TrapnellTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Cullen v. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Weatherly v. Deloitte & Touche, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
  2. America Online, Inc. v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Sun Coast Resources, Inc. v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  4. Tracker Marine, L.P. v. Ogle, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. Spera v. Fleming, Hovenkamp & Grayson, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API