Legal Opinion

State v. Childress

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1987No. 42A87PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

In her first assignment of error, the defendant contends it was error not to allow her motion to dismiss at the close of the evidence. She bases this argument on the premise that the State did not prove that Robert Vanhoy did not accidentally shoot himself. In this case the State relies on circumstantial evidence for the proof of a part of its case. In evaluating this evidence the State is entitled to every reasonable inference that may be drawn therefrom. State v. Byrd, 309 N.C. 132, 305 S.E. 2d 724 (1983).

In order to survive a motion to dismiss the charge of first degree…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Diana Pepper Sevigny v. Andrew F. Dicksey, Individually, and the Town of Carolina Beach, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  2. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API