Legal Opinion

State v. Haywood

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 2001No. COA00-412PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSON, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of the crimes of first degree rape, first degree sexual offense, and conspiracy to commit first degree rape. We find no error.

The facts presented at trial tended to show that Loretta Kimbrough (Loretta) was walking along a road in Robeson County on the evening of 26 October 1996 when a car containing three men pulled up beside her. Defendant was in the passenger seat, James Haywood (James), defendant’s cousin, was driving, and Tim Robinson (Tim) sat in the backseat. Loretta recognized James’ face and knew Tim, as he had previously dated her…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. GarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. NapierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API