Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Rich (In Re Rich)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 25, 2009No. Bankruptcy No. 08-51169. Adversary No. 08-2142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

C. KATHRYN PRESTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This cause came on for consideration of the Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc.# 13) and the Defendant’s Memorandum Contra thereto (Docs. # 12 and # 14), filed in the above captioned adversary proceeding. The Court having considered the record and the arguments of the parties, makes the following findings and conclusions.

The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334, and the standing General Order of reference entered in this District. This…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. NATIONAL SIGN AND SIGNAL v. LivingstonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. Rebekah v. Crownover (In Re Crownover)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
  3. Muse v. Day (In Re Day)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  4. Irvin v. FallerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API