Legal Opinion

Muse v. Day (In Re Day)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 30, 2009No. 19-12422PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DETERMINING DEBT TO BE NON-DISCHARGEABLE

JAMES F. SCHNEIDER, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, C. Anthony Muse (“Muse”) and the defendant, Richard Ray Day (“Day”). For the reasons set forth, the plaintiffs motion will be granted, the defendant’s motion will be denied and the judgment rendered against the defendant by a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Maryland, will be determined to be…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freedom Medical, Inc. v. Janssens (In Re Janssens)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  2. Darnell v. WasingerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
  3. Roark v. San Diego County Credit UnionDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
  4. Van Dexter v. BarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API