Legal Opinion

State v. Slovik

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 12, 2003No. 00CR0023; A111274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for manufacturing, delivering, and possessing methamphetamine. He argues, among other things, that the trial court erred in imposing enhanced sentences on those offenses because each offense involved 10 grams or more of “a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine.” See ORS 475.996(1)(a)(C); ORS 475.996(2)(b)(C).1 We reverse and remand for resentencing.

While performing a valid search on June 30, 1999, police officers found items associated with manufacturing methamphetamine. Among other things, they found a gallon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. StonemanOregon Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. RankinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API