Legal Opinion

Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc. v. South Georgia Natural Gas Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1961No. 38998PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

The sole question to be determined is whether the correspondence and acts of the respective parties, as reflected by the record in the instant case, constitute accord and satisfaction so as to bar the plaintiff’s right to pursue an action for the purchase price of the radio equipment.

“When a creditor receives and retains a sum of money from his debtor less than the amount actually due him with the understanding, either express or implied, that it is received by him in satisfaction of his claim or demand, he cannot thereafter treat it as a nullity and recover the balance. . .”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scales v. PeevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Rivers v. Cole CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Dixie Belle Mills, Inc. v. Specialty MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  5. Sylvania Electric Products Inc. v. Electrical Wholesalers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. King v. SchaefferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Simmons v. State Farm &C. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Simmons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Souchak v. CloseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Eldon Industries, Inc. v. Paradies and CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API