Village of Medford v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This appeal arises from an ejectment action by which the village of Medford has attempted to remove Versul and Clara Wilson, defendants, from a portion of First Street Southeast, a platted but unopened street that defendants have been occupying.
In 1859, a plat of an addition to the village of Medford was recorded, dedicating the streets and alleys located therein to public use. First Street Southeast (also known as Park Street) was dedicated but was never opened between Grove Street (a.k.a. First Avenue Southeast) and Ridge Street (a.k.a. Second Avenue Southeast). Defendants have operated a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Headley v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Town of Chouteau v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Rogers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bolen v. GlassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re Maintenance of Road Areas, Etc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Town of Red Rock v. County of MowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In re the Rental Dwelling License held by KhanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Bolen v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.