Legal Opinion
Headley v. City of Rochester
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1936PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiff since. 1918 has been the owner of premises in the city of Rochester which are bounded on the south by East avenue and on the west by North Goodman street. East avenue and North Goodman street have been, for more than twenty years, public streets or highways. In 1931, pursuant to article 3 of the General City Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 21), the Council of the city of Rochester passed an ordinance which amended, changed and added to an official map or plan previously adopted by the Council “ so as to correct and revise said established Official Map or Plan and to lay out new streets and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Brous v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Congressional School of Aeronautics, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State ex rel. Nelson v. ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Oriental Boulevard Co. v. HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Howard County v. jjM, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.