Legal Opinion
Dakota Foundry, Inc. v. Tromley Industrial Holdings, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided August 29, 2012No. CIV 11-1026-RALPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dakota Foundry, Inc., sued Defendant Tromley Industrial Holdings, Inc. (“Tromley”), claiming breach of contract, breach of express and implied warranties, and negligence related to equipment that Tromley delivered for Dakota Foundry. Tromley filed a motion to compel arbitration or, in the alternative, to dismiss. Doc. 9. In an Order and Opinion, Judge Charles B. Kornmann, to whom the case was assigned at the time, denied Tromley’s motion and determined there to be questions of fact concerning…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jackson v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
- Coffey v. CoffeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Heldt v. Payday Financial, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Midland Farms, LLC v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Erickson v. Thrivent Insurance Agency Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.