Halfman v. Spreen
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Lee District Court. — Hon. J. M. Caset, Judge. Action in chancery to restrain and enjoin defendant from maintaining a nuisance by keeping a saloon wherein are sold intoxicating liquors in violation of law. The district court entered a judgment against defendant for costs, but dismissed the petition of the plaintiff and intervenor. The intervenor Andrews appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
— I. The plaintiff Andrews became a party to the action upon his petition of intervention. The original petition was filed May 19, 1886, and the intervenor’s petition was filed July 7, 1886. The defendant, in his answer, admits that when the original petition was filed he kept a saloon in the building therein described, but he alleges that when his answer was filed,February 3, 1888, he had quit the business, and was not then keeping a saloon. The evidence shows that until a motion for a temporary injunction was made in' this case, on the third day of February, 1888, defendant was engaged in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Judge v. KribsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Danner v. HotzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. FraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- State ex rel. Kern v. JeromeWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Tuttle v. BuntingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Perry v. Howe Co-operative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Drummond v. Richland City Drug Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.