Tuttle v. Bunting
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Oarroll District 'Gourt. — ITon. E. M. Powers, Judge. Action to enjoin an alleged liquor nuisance. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, C. J.
This is an ordinary action to enjoin the defendants from maintaining an alleged liquor nuisance in a certain building in the town of Lanesboro in Carroll County. Defendant Bunting pleaded that at the time of filing his answer he did not own the premises in which the saloon had been conducted; that he had parted with his interest therein January 14, 1909. Defendant Ochampaugh pleaded that he had been a barkeeper for his eodefendant prior to July 1, 1908, but that on that day he quit the business and had not been engaged in selling liquor on the premises or at any other place. Each also filed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Judge v. KribsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Blennerhassett v. Incorporated of Forest CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Donnelly v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Danner v. HotzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Patterson v. NicolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Bradford v. BarbiereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- State ex rel. Kern v. JeromeWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- United States v. MargolisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1923
- Martin v. State Ex Rel. EidsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- State v. SeipesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.