Legal Opinion

Danner v. Hotz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 11, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Johnson Circuit Coicrt. Action in equity to enjoin a nuisance caused by keeping a place for tbe sale and manufacture of intoxicating liquors as a beverage in a building situate on certain real estate wliicb is sufficiently described. The relief asked was granted, and the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, C. J.

The court ordered the abatement of the nuisance, and that the furniture, fixtures and movable property on or about the premises, used in carrying on the unlawful business, be removed therefrom and sold, and the proceeds applied to the payment *390of costs, and all fines adjudged against the defendants. It was further adjudged that possession should be taken of said building, and the same be securely closed for one year as provided by law. This case is triable anew in this court, and the question is whether the judgment of the circuit court can, under the pleadings and evidence, be affirmed ; and,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Judge v. KribsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Forbes v. DelashmuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. FraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. State ex rel. English v. FanningNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State ex rel. Kern v. JeromeWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Reed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Tuttle v. BuntingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API