Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 1, 1976No. 73 Civ. 4259 (HFW)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
WERKER, District Judge.
These are two actions which arise out of an embezzlement scheme carried out by one Jack Dick in connection with the operation of Black Watch Farms, Inc., a company which was engaged in the breeding of cattle sold to investors for tax shelter purposes. The facts of each of Tucker v. Arthur Andersen & Co., and State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Arthur Andersen & Co., are reported respectively at 67 F.R.D. 468 (S.D.N.Y.1975) and at 65 F.R.D. 518 (S.D.N.Y.1975).
The plaintiffs in the Tucker action have moved for a joint trial on certain issues…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. KnauerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Tucker v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Bascom Launder Corp. v. Telecoin Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- United States v. LustigDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Werner v. Satterlee, Stephens, Burke & BurkeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Spirt v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982