Legal Opinion

First Union National Bank v. Bonito

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 22, 1998No. AC 17758; AC 17759; AC 17760; AC 17761PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In these actions to foreclose tax liens, the owner of the equity of redemption with respect to several parcels of land appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motions to open the judgments of strict foreclosure for the purpose of extending the law days. The decision whether to open a foreclosure judgment rests in the discretion of the trial court. General Statutes *328§ 49-15. After a review of the record, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in this case. See New Haven Savings Bank v. Gurland, 3 Conn. App. 508, 489 A.2d 1070 (1985).

The judgments are affirmed…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New Haven Savings Bank v. GurlandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Union National Bank v. BonitoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API