Legal Opinion
Bayer AG v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 10, 1992No. 92 Civ. 0381 (WK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Bayer AG, a German corporation, and Miles, Inc., its wholly owned United States subsidiary (collectively, “plaintiff”) move pursuant to Fed.Rule of Civ. Pro. 56(c) for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff filed the instant suit against defendant Barr Laboratories, Inc. alleging patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2). Defendant’s Answer and Counterclaim asserted in two affirmative defenses and two counterclaims that plaintiffs U.S. Patent No. 4,670,444 (the “ ‘444 patent”) is invalid for obviousness-type double patenting.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Quad Environmental Technologies Corporation v. Union Sanitary District, and A.P.T., Inc., a California Corp. D/B/A Calvert Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Bayer Ag and Bayer Corporation v. Carlsbad Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008