Legal Opinion
In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 20, 2003No. 1:00-MDL-1383PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
TRAGER, District Judge.
This suit challenges the validity of agreements between the brand-name manufacturer of the widely used antibiotic ci-profloxacin hydrochloride (“Cipro”) and potential generic manufacturers of Cipro. Direct Purchaser and Indirect Purchaser Class Plaintiffs and Individual Non-Class Plaintiffs (collectively, “plaintiffs”) have brought suit against Bayer AG, a German company, and its American subsidiary, Bayer Corporation (collectively, “Bayer”) and Barr Laboratories, Inc. (“Barr”); The Rugby Group, Inc. (“Rugby”); Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (“HMR”); and…
2Cases cited117 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Wyser-Pratte Management Co., Inc. v. Telxon Corporation, Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Joblove v. Barr Labs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re: Cardizem Cd Antitrust Litigation. Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., and Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.