Legal Opinion
Doo v. Packwood
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 16, 1968No. Civ. 906PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
The Doo family, husbands and wives (George and Ying, Jack and Fun, Kenneth and Ruby, Quong and Jennie), were partners in the retail grocery business in Turlock; at times they ran three major markets and during other periods two; one of their stores was located on Landers Avenue. The plaintiffs were building a larger and more modern market on the same street, and, therefore, projected the sale of the lot with the building on it in which they had previously conducted one of their grocery ventures. However, they desired to make sure that the building would not be used to compete with them.
In…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Berryman v. Hotel Savoy CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Los Angeles Terminal Land Co. v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Wayt v. PateeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Riley v. Bear Creek Planning CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Davidson Bros. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Taormina Theosophical Community, Inc. v. SilverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Hall v. American Oil CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Cox v. SimonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.