Legal Opinion

Foster v. Lindley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1898No. 2,487PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

This was an action by appellee against appellant to enforce and collect the penalty provided by section 1091a, Horner’s R. S. 1897, for a failure to release of record a mortgage executed by appellee to appellant, and which it was alleged , in the complaint had been fully paid; that a request to release had been duly made, and that appellant had neglected and failed to release the same. Appellant appeared to the action and challenged the sufficiency of the .complaint by a demurrer, which demurrer was overruled and he excepted. This ruling is assigned as error. The record, as it comes to us,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slagle v. BodmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Masten v. Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Brannock v. StockerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neyens v. FlesherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Westport Stone Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State ex rel. Whistler v. HerodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API