Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Whistler v. Herod

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1898No. 2,652PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The question earnestly argued by counsel is not properly before us. The rulings of the court sustaining demurrers of the appellees to the complaint of the appellant are assigned as errors. In the transcript of the record filed in this court such rulings, with the exceptions thereto of the appellant, are shown, but no further proceedings are set forth in the transcript. What final judgment, if any, was rendered does not appear. Sustaining a demurrer to a complaint is not a final judgment, and from such ruling alone, without the further action of the court, an appeal will not lie. Brannock v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Champ v. KendrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gray v. SingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Thomas v. Chicago & Erie Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Slagle v. BodmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Masten v. Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Westport Stone Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hopp v. LukenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Ernest v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. State v. LanpharIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Bush v. BushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API