Anderson v. Lam Builders, Inc.

The plaintiffs brought this case against the defendants pursuant to the provisions of G.L.c. 249, §4, for certiorari, challenging the decision of the Planning Board of the Town of Holden to endorse a property plan of LAM Builders, Inc. and Lam Builders, LLC (collectively, “LAM”) as not requiring subdivision approval under G.L.c. 41, §81P. This case is currently *90before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and LAM’s cross motion for judgment on the pleadings.3 For the following reasons, the plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED and LAM’s cross motion is ALLOWED.

BACKGROUND

The…