Legal Opinion
City of Bridgeport v. 2284 Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 5, 2001No. AC 20158PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
This is a summary process action in which the defendant appeals from the judgment of possession against it. The dispositive issue is whether the defendant should have been a defendant in the tax lien foreclosure action by which the plaintiff, the city of Bridgeport (city), acquired title.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*626The following relevant facts are taken from a stipulation of the parties. In 1993, the defendant entered into a written lease and took possession as a tenant of 2288 and 2294 Fairfield Avenue in Bridgeport. The lease was not witnessed, notarized…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BomberoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Van SickleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Drazen Properties Ltd. Partnership v. E. F. Mahon, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BomberoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Palmeri v. AllenConnecticut Superior Court · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Bridgeport v. 2284 Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Foundation Capital Resources, Inc. v. Udo-OkonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023