Legal Opinion
Holland v. VALLEY SERVICES, INC.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 7, 2009No. Civil Action 06-0178 (RMU)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in Part and Denying in Part The Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Ordering Further Briefing on Damages
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs are trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan (“the 1992 Plan”) who seek to recover from defendant Bibeau Construction Company, Inc. (“the defendant”) 1 amounts paid to certain beneficiaries pursuant to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael Holland v. Bibeau Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014