Legal Opinion

Cruz v. Union Pacific Railroad

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1985No. 83CA0438PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN CISE, Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, David A. Cruz, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq., to recover damages for an injury to his right leg while he was employed as a rear brakeman by defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (U.P.). U.P. denied that it had been negligent, and raised the affirmative defense of contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff. The jury found that both parties had been negligent, that the negligence of each had had some causal connection with plaintiff's injuries, that the U.P.’s percentage of fault was 5%…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Christensen v. HooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. Thompson Mahogany Company (Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  4. Spears Free Clinic & Hospital for Poor Children v. MaierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  5. Louis Casko v. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company, Louis Casko v. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Core-Mark Midcontinent Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Freedman v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Clough v. Williams Production RMT Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Plambeck v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API