Legal Opinion

Core-Mark Midcontinent Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2016No. Court of Appeals No. 14CA1575PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE J. JONES

T1 Plaintiffs, Core-Mark International, Inc, and its wholly owned, subsidiary, Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. (collectively, Core-Mark); and Core-Mark's casualty insurers, United States Fire Insurance Company and Commonwealth Insurance Company (collectively, the Insurers), appeal the judgment entered after a jury trial to determine damages on their breach of contract claims against defendaht, Sonitrol Corporation. Sonitrol cross-appeals the judgment and conditionally eross-appeals the district court's denial of its motion to strike a portion of Core-Mark's damages claim.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Valentine v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Landmark Land Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Estate of Stevenson Ex Rel. Talovich v. Hollywood Bar & Cafe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Gerrity Oil & Gas Corp. v. MagnessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Day v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Grant Brothers Ranch, LLC v. Antero Resources Piceance CorpColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical ProgressDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  4. Landmark Towers Association, Inc. v. UMB Bank, N.AColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Acierno Ex Rel. Acierno v. GaryfallouColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API