Legal Opinion
Bravman v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 18, 1992No. 89 Civ. 3444 (RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Baxter Healthcare Corporation (“Baxter”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the Amended Complaint of Plaintiffs Aaron Bravman (“Bravman”) and his wife Muriel. For the reasons set forth below, Baxter’s motion is granted, and judgment dismissing the Amended Complaint will be entered.
The Parties
Bravman and his wife are Pennsylvania residents. Bravman, a retired stock broker, is in his mid-60s.
Baxter is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Deerfield, Illinois.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Bovsun v. SanperiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Donald Binder v. Long Island Lighting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Battalla v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Bravman v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Aaron Bravman Muriel Bravman v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Walus v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Gluckman v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.