Legal Opinion
Walus v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 22, 1993No. Civ. 92-3407 (CSF)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.
Before the court is a motion brought pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by defendants, Pfizer, Inc. (“Pfizer”) and Shiley, Inc. (“Shiley”), for an order granting summary judgment in their favor on plaintiffs’ complaint. The court has considered the parties’ written submissions and oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted.
Facts
This is an action involving a prosthetic heart valve manufactured by Shiley that was implanted in plaintiff Robert Walus’s heart in October 1982 to replace his failing…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Vera L. POLLOCK, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH LONG LINESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Becker v. Interstate PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Bayer Corp. Combination Aspirin Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Francis E. Parker Memorial Home, Inc. v. Georgia-Pacific LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Williams v. Purdue Pharma Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Wallis v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.