Cornelius v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of manslaughter, and his punishment assessed at five years- confinement in the penitentiary.
1. Bill of exceptions Ho. 3 complains that the State was permitted to prove by Dr. G. T. Vinyard the following: “Q. From the examination you made there what is your best judgment as to the entrance and range of that bullet? Appellant’s counsel: We object to that. Let 'him state the facts and let the jury draw their conclusions. The court: Did he state he passed the probe clear through the entrance to the exit? A. Ho, sir. I passed it up from the entrance wound;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stringfellow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Casey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Arnwine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Pickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Borrer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Hickey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Serna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Pace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.