Legal Opinion

Casey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1906No. 3477PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BBOOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

Appellant’s ninth assignment of error complains that the Court erred in refusing to permit appellant to prove by witness A. B. Brandon, the res gestee statement of the boy, By Casey, occurring on the sidewalk in front of the building where the killing occurred, and within fifteen feet of the immediate place of the killing, and about one and a half minutes aftér the killing while said boy was greatly agitated and crying. The statement made to the witness…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ma Riojas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Airhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Stringfellow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Stull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tyrrel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Carlile v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Cornelius v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API