Fiorito v. Clyde Equipment Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQÜIN, District Judge.-
Plaintiffs in error brought this action at law to recover special damages arising from breach of warranty. Defendant answered that the contract is in writing, and from the warranty excepts special damages. And plaintiffs replied that they signed the writing without reading it and in reliance upon defendant’s misrepresentation that it conformed to the prior oral agreement for a general warranty.
In this anomalous state of the pleadings, without repleader or transfer to the equity side of the court and without any appropriate objection to procedure or evidence, there…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Lumber Underwriters of NY v. RifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Western Manufacturing Co. v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Plews v. BurrageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1921
- Stone v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whitney Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Irons v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Neff & Fry Co. v. AshmeadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Peterson v. A. Guthrie & Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1933
- Whitney Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926