Legal Opinion

Peterson v. A. Guthrie & Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 14, 1933No. 20481PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

I am constrained to the conclusion that there was a mistake of a past and present existing fact, and that the plaintiffs were misled against their will in the execution of the release by statements, representations, and conduct of defendant’s agents, in that the plaintiffs were not advised as to the true status of the wife’s condition and were misled by statements of plaintiff’s legal status in relation to the wife’s presence at the place of injury, as disclosed by the evidence: (a) That she herself was a wrongdoer by trespassing on defendant’s property and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Duke v. ForceWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  3. Wagner v. National Life Ins. Co. of MontpelierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  4. Union Pac. R. v. SyasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  5. Cadman v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jack Mann Chevrolet Co. v. Associates Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  2. Hall v. ChaltisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. McKinley v. Greyhound ParkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API