Legal Opinion

Van Ripper v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1961PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Oregon Liquor Control Commission (ORS 471.705), from a decree of the circuit court which ruled that (1) a regulation adopted by the commission May 10, 1960, known as Regulation 17, was “void and without effect”; (2) action taken by the commission October 12,1960, which cancelled the plaintiff’s dispenser’s license (Class “B”) for his violation of Regulation 17 was unauthorized and (3) the commission should reinstate the license.

The defendant (the commission) presents a single assignment of error which reads:

“The Circuit Court erred in decreeing: that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Perry v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Gouge v. DavidOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Casciato v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Sun Ray Drive-In Dairy, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. University of Oregon Co-Operative Store v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hi-Starr, Inc. v. Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API