Pedlow v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent court to order payment of $85,750 as reasonable compensation for his services as an attorney. Petitioner was appointed by respondent to represent an indigent defendant in a capital case. He alleges that respondent has abused its discretion by ordering that a substantially lower sum ($38,470) be paid to him and that his further attempts to negotiate with respondent have been fruitless.
Earlier, this court summarily denied this petition because of petitioner’s failure to offer any documentation or other record in support of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Lemelle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Sherwood v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Popelka, Allard, McCowan & Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oaks Management Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Lantz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Arnelle v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.