Legal Opinion

Arnelle v. City and County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1983No. Civ. 50622PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MILLER, J.

Appellant H. Jesse Arnelle appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after respondent’s demurrer to appellant’s first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.

Appellant was appointed pursuant to Penal Code section 987, subdivision (b), 1 to represent an indigent defendant charged with the murder of a police officer. No compensation for appellant was agreed upon in advance, and after the trial appellant submitted a petition for an order compensating him pursuant to section 987.2, subdivision (a). Appellant declared that he had spent over 200 hours in court and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Ingram v. Justice CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. CastilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Union of American Physicians & Dentists v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Gilbert v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Amarawansa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Bye v. District Court ex rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API