Blood v. Kenneth A. Murray Insurance, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
1. INTRODUCTION
This appeal follows a jury trial to determine whether James Blood’s automobile insurance coverage remained in effect, despite his failure to pay premiums, because the insurer sent notice of termination to the wrong address. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the insurer after concluding (1) that the insurer had not met its obligation to notify Blood but (2) that the failure did not cause Blood’s lack of coverage. The parties ask us to review whether the insurer’s efforts to notify were examined under the proper legal standard and whether it was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Rosenberg v. SmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Willoya v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. GuessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Bennett v. HedglinAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wiersum v. HarderAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Farmer v. Alaska USA Title Agency, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Lee v. AIG Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Alexei Kuzmin v. Talisman Marine Insurance Protected Cell Inc. d/b/a Talisman Marine Insurance Company Inc., et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Kingery v. BarrettAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.