Farmer v. Alaska USA Title Agency, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A debtor was given proper initial notice of a pending nonjudicial foreclosure sale but was not given additional notice when the sale was postponed. The debtor argued that equity required re-notice after each postponement and that the lack of re-notice violated his due process rights. The superior court granted summary judgment to the creditor. We affirm because equity does not require re-notice after postponement of a nonjudicial foreclosure sale and notice of a postponement by public announcement satisfies due process.:
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In 1992…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Beegan v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Rosenberg v. SmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jeffery A. Wendt v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Mark Thomas v. Joseph P. Casteel TrustAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Kelly v. Clear Recon CorpDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
- Tagaban v. City of PelicanAlaska Supreme Court · 2015