Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Alaska USA Title Agency, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2014No. 6963 S-15163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A debtor was given proper initial notice of a pending nonjudicial foreclosure sale but was not given additional notice when the sale was postponed. The debtor argued that equity required re-notice after each postponement and that the lack of re-notice violated his due process rights. The superior court granted summary judgment to the creditor. We affirm because equity does not require re-notice after postponement of a nonjudicial foreclosure sale and notice of a postponement by public announcement satisfies due process.:

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 1992…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Beegan v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Rosenberg v. SmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jeffery A. Wendt v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Mark Thomas v. Joseph P. Casteel TrustAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Kelly v. Clear Recon CorpDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
  4. Tagaban v. City of PelicanAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API