Legal Opinion
Matter of Puna Sugar Company, Limited
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1976No. 5602PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
547 P.2d 2 (1976)
In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of PUNA SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED, Appellant.
No. 5602.
Supreme Court of Hawaii.
March 8, 1976.
C. Michael Hare and Richard L. Griffith, Honolulu (Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright of counsel) Honolulu, for appellant.
Alana W. Lau, Deputy Atty. Gen., Ronald Amemiya, Atty. Gen., State of Hawaii, Honolulu, for appellee.
Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and KOBAYASHI, OGATA, MENOR and KIDWELL, JJ.
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
The taxpayer, Puna Sugar Company, Limited (hereinafter, Puna Sugar), is a Hawaii corporation engaged in the business of producing and refining sugar…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Colonial Pipeline Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Knappton Towboat Co. v. ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Western Electric Co. v. New Mexico Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re the Tax Appeal of O.W. Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- City and County of Honolulu v. SteinerHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re the Tax Appeal of SwannHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re the Tax Appeals of Amfac, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.