Legal Opinion

In Re the Tax Appeals of Amfac, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1982No. 6701PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

The questions presented in this interlocutory appeal are 1) whether the state director of taxation has discretion under Chaptér 246, HRS (1976) to utilize methods of valuation in addition to the replacement cost approach in determining the fair market value of buildings for real property tax purposes, and 2) if so, whether his failure to consider the utilization of alternative methods necessarily constitutes a basis for adjustment of an assessment. Appellant AMFAC, INC. (taxpayer) argues that these questions must be an swered in the affirmative in view…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. KiernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Waikiki Resort Hotel, Inc. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re Appeal of Johnstown AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Chrysler Corp. v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tax Appeal of Weinberg Ex Rel. WKH Corp. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. United Truck Rental Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. Kleenco Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. City and County of Honolulu v. SteinerHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Tax Appeal of County of Maui v. KM HAW.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re the Tax Appeal of SwannHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API