Legal Opinion

In Re the Tax Appeal of Swann

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1989No. 12982; TAX APPEAL CASE NO. 2424PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

Frank W. Swann (Swann) and Emmy Lou Swann (collectively Appellants or the taxpayers) appeal from the judgment of the tax appeal court affirming the assessed valuation of Appellants’ real property for the 1986-1987 tax year, as determined by the Director of Finance of the County of Maui (Director). Essentially, the taxpayers claim that the method which the County’s real property tax appraiser used to determine the assessed valuation of the improvements on their land was illegal and, as a consequence, the County imposed on them “a disproportionate and unequal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. KiernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Gadd v. KelleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Shoemaker v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Curtis v. Board of AppealsHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re of the Tax Appeal of Maile Sky Court Co. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Tax Appeal of Weinberg Ex Rel. WKH Corp. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Tax Appeal of Alford v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  5. City and County of Honolulu v. SteinerHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API