Legal Opinion

Hathaway v. Bornmann

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 5, 1950PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This is an action to recover damages for an alleged unlawful eviction. The trial court rendered judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.

The court’s finding, which is not subject to material correction, presents the following facts: In 1946 the defendant resided with his wife in a partially completed garage in Monroe. This structure was unsuitable for winter living and the defendant decided to move to Bridgeport. Since it was difficult to find a rent, on June 6, 1946, he purchased a one-family, eight-room house, then occupied by the plaintiff and his family. It was in a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fahey v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. Basak v. DamutzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Snyder v. ReshenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Sviggum v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Burley v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Maturo v. GerardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Varga v. ParelesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Wallenta v. MoscowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API