Legal Opinion
Varga v. Pareles
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 15, 1951PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The plaintiffs, Julius and Martha Varga, brought this action to recover damages from the defendants, Herman and Charlotte Páreles. The complaint alleged that the plaintiffs had been unlawfully evicted from their premises. Mrs. Páreles was subsequently dropped as a defendant. The jury returned a verdict for Julius on the complaint, and for the defendant on a counterclaim for rent against both plaintiffs. The defendant’s appeal is concerned only with the verdict and judgment in favor of Julius. Since the status of Mrs. Varga has no bearing on the appeal, we shall ignore her as a party.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McGann v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Schaefer v. O. K. Tool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- David v. FaymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- David v. FaymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Larobina v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.