Legal Opinion

Ames v. MacPhail

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1939No. Docket No. 30, Calendar No. 40,415PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Suit on promissory notes brought by the administratrix of the estate of Jay Ames, deceased.

September 2, 1919, Clark M. Pomeroy, now deceased, and Fred MacPhail, defendant and appellant herein, purchased a mercantile business from Jay Ames, giving him therefor a promissory note for $11,400 and a chattel mortgage, as copartners, to secure the payment of the same. Prior to November 1, 1921, the amount of the debt was reduced to $10,000, for which Pomeroy and MacPhail gave ten $1,000 notes. One of these notes was paid. Indorsements of interest payments on the other notes for the years 1922 to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Turnbull v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Davis v. Belmont Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Johns v. Wisconsin Land & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hiscock v. HiscockMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Bubser v. RanguetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tumey v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Flynn v. McLouth Steel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Stark Hickey, Inc. v. Standard Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Flynn v. McLouth Steel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API