Legal Opinion
Cordas v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 5, 2017No. Case No. 16-CV-04065-RSPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge
I.INTRODUCTION
Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) moves to compel arbitration in this putative class action filed by Michael Cordas. For the reasons that follow, Uber’s motion is granted.
II.BACKGROUND
In July 2015, Cordas ■ downloaded the Uber ride-sharing app and attempted to request a ride in New York City. His requested ride did not appear after the estimated 10-minute arrival time elapsed, and Cbrdas was unsuccessful in his attempts to contact the driver. Cordas received a notification from Uber that he…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Carey Brennan v. Opus BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Esquer v. Educ. Mgmt. Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Davis v. USA Nutra Labs, Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Lopez v. Terra's Kitchen, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Wilson v. Playtika, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Uber Techs., Inc. v. RoyzNevada Supreme Court · 2022
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.