Legal Opinion

Denny v. Wright & O'Rourke

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

BeauChamp, J.:

This purports to be an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Canadian county. Attached to the petition in error is what purports 'to be simply a stenographer’s transcript of the evidence taken at the trial of the case. There is no copy of any of the pleadings or any judgment or final order of the trial court in the case, nor any motion for new trial shown. The record upon the conclusion of the testimony discloses that there was a motion made by defendants’ counsel to dismiss as to the defendants Wright & O’Rourke. This motion was by the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. McMechan v. ChristySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. Board of Comrs. Custer Co. v. MoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  4. Sproat v. DurlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Gardenhire v. BurdickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Meadors v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. FainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Schuck v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API