Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 24, 1963No. 39912PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
G. R. Bowman and Roy S. Bowman, plaintiffs in error, commenced an action to recover damages for the alleged failure to properly install an air conditioning unit, against Oklahoma Natural Gas Company, hereinafter referred to as Oklahoma Natural; Servel, Inc., referred to as Servel; and Arkla Air Conditioning Corporation, referred to as Arkla.
The trial court sustained the pleas to the jurisdiction as to defendants Servel and Arkla and dismissed the action against them. The demurrer of Oklahoma Natural to plaintiffs’ petition, which alleged two causes of action, was sustained on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. RosamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Douglass v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Gaffney v. Unit Crane and Shovel Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1955
- Heath v. Moncrief Furnace Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Booth Glass Co. v. Huntingfield Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Meier v. Alfa-Laval, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Black Clawson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- A. J. Aberman, Inc. v. Funk Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Paul Holt Drilling, Inc., and Paul Holt, an Individual v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.